- Stage
-
Generate Idea
- Topic
-
Develop the project idea
Need assistance with developing a project idea?
A solid understanding of the research area, supported by input from peers, mentors, and experts, is regarded as an essential early step in the research process. This page provides information about Duke resources that can be used to support high‑quality research as ideas are developed.
Feasibility considerations
Collaborations
Collaborations with subject matter experts, statisticians, research staff, or other personnel may be essential for the success of the project, depending on the scope and focus of the research question.
Funding
If funding is needed to conduct the project, tools and personnel are available to help determine potential opportunities.
Operations and logistics
Discipline-specific project planning resources are available to help assess the operational and logistical needs of the project idea.
Preliminary data
Pilot or preliminary data may be needed to support the scientific importance of the project, as well as cohort discovery for projects involving human participants.
Tools and strategies for developing a project idea
Conducting literature reviews
Conducting a review of the literature is standard practice when developing a project idea to understand the most current information in a given field of research and to begin to develop the rationale for a project. Even experienced researchers may encounter new developments when planning a project. Knowledge of prior research should guide the design of new work by:
- Identifying limitations or gaps in previous study design or methodology
- Expanding upon previous findings
- Identifying validated tools or methods for conducting research
The most reputable and reliable sources should be used when conducting reviews. Colleagues, mentors, and librarians can help determine the most respected sources, especially in any new fields. The following resources can help:
Conducting concept reviews
Concept reviews help researchers formalize an idea through input from peers and experts early on in the process. Not only will it enhance the research concept, but feedback can often help find potential issues.
Three common ways to conduct concept reviews are:
Informal meeting:
A discussion with peers, colleagues, or mentors to brainstorm an idea. This time can be used to bounce ideas around and “pressure test” research concepts.
Written feedback:
Investigators can create a one-pager (sometimes called a white paper) of the project concept and request review by colleagues and/or mentors. This is helpful for identifying gaps in methodology or potential collaborations. One-pagers can also be used as a first step in identifying potential foundation funding matches, or to seek early feedback from funding agency program officers on whether a project would match the program interests.
- The Duke Office of Campus Research Development guide for stating the problem and developing the project rationale may be helpful in developing project one-pagers.
Formal concept review session:
Internal concept reviews are a time to present research ideas to a group of experts to receive feedback on the justification, approach, and logistics of a study. The Vice Chair for Research in a department or a mentor should know whether there is an internal concept review process already established or help conduct one.
- The Office of Physician-Scientist Development has a concept review program available to physician-scientist faculty and trainees who do not have access to departmental services.
- The Duke Office of Campus Research Development can assist campus faculty planning to submit a proposal for funding.
- If there is not access to an established concept review program, one can be set up.
Support for humanities research projects
Access the Humanities research support page for resources on:
- Accessing primary sources or archival material
- Funding for humanities research projects
- Humanities support services and resources